The 1990s File Feature
Highwire
The Rolling Stones and Highwire: A Gulf War Single "Highwire" was released by the Rolling Stones in March 1991 on Rolling Stones Records, timed to coincide a…
01 The Story
The Rolling Stones and Highwire: A Gulf War Single
"Highwire" was released by the Rolling Stones in March 1991 on Rolling Stones Records, timed to coincide almost exactly with the conclusion of Operation Desert Storm, the American-led coalition military campaign to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait. The single was one of the most overtly topical releases in the Stones' long career, addressing the arms trade, geopolitical hypocrisy, and the human cost of conflict with an explicitness unusual for a band that had spent most of the previous two decades producing polished mainstream rock rather than pointed political commentary.
The song was drawn from Flashpoint, a live album compiled from recordings made during the Stones' massive Steel Wheels/Urban Jungle Tour of 1989 and 1990, one of the highest-grossing concert tours in history up to that point. The album was released in April 1991 and functioned as both a document of the tour and a vehicle for a small number of new studio recordings, of which "Highwire" was the most significant. The juxtaposition of a sprawling commercial touring document with a sharply political new studio track created an unusual context for the song's reception.
Mick Jagger and Keith Richards wrote "Highwire" in direct response to the Gulf War, which had begun with the United States-led coalition's aerial campaign in January 1991 and concluded with a ground offensive that drove Iraqi forces from Kuwait within one hundred hours. The speed and completeness of the military victory did not diminish the Stones' concerns about the underlying dynamics of the conflict, particularly the fact that Western nations had supplied weapons to Iraq during its 1980s war with Iran and now found themselves fighting an enemy partly equipped with arms they had themselves provided. This irony was central to the song's lyrical content.
The production of the track was handled by the Stones themselves, with Chris Kimsey assisting on mixing duties. The recording had the purposeful directness characteristic of the band's best studio work of the period, built around a hard rock groove with Jagger's vocals delivered with the kind of urgent, slightly accusatory tone appropriate to the material. Keith Richards and Ron Wood provided the guitar work, and Charlie Watts's drumming gave the track the forward momentum the subject demanded.
"Highwire" reached number 57 on the Billboard Hot 100 in the United States, a modest commercial performance that reflected the challenges of marketing overtly political material to a mainstream rock audience. In the United Kingdom, where the song also charted, the reception was somewhat warmer, partly because British political culture was more accustomed to the integration of topical commentary into popular music and partly because the Stones retained a slightly more credible political identity in their home country than they did in the American market, where their image had become more thoroughly associated with commercial spectacle.
The accompanying music video for "Highwire" incorporated news footage and imagery related to the Gulf War, adding a documentary dimension to the single's impact and reinforcing the explicitness of its political content. The video received some rotation on MTV, though the network's approach to political content during the Gulf War was generally cautious, and the Stones' critique of arms dealing was not universally welcomed in a moment of strong patriotic feeling in the United States.
Flashpoint itself reached number 16 on the Billboard 200, a solid performance for a live album. The Stones' ability to place a live record in the top twenty demonstrated the continued commercial force of their brand even at a moment when their recording output had become somewhat intermittent. "Highwire" functioned within the album as a statement of continued artistic seriousness, evidence that the band remained capable of engaging with contemporary events rather than simply recycling their legendary past.
In the longer perspective of the Stones' career, "Highwire" occupies a specific and somewhat isolated position as one of the band's most direct political statements, more comparable to "Street Fighting Man" from 1968 than to the personal and romantic material that had dominated their output since the mid-1970s. The song's candor and its willingness to name specific political dynamics made it an anomaly in the band's later catalog, and it retains interest precisely because of that distinctiveness.
02 Song Meaning
Highwire: Meaning and Themes
"Highwire" is a song about complicity, specifically the complicity of arms-dealing nations who supply weapons to one adversary and then find themselves in conflict with that same adversary when political circumstances shift. The Rolling Stones wrote the track in direct response to the Gulf War of 1991, and the lyrical content engages with the uncomfortable reality that Western governments, including the United States and the United Kingdom, had sold weaponry to Iraq during its prolonged war with Iran in the 1980s, only to face Iraqi military forces equipped with those same weapons less than a decade later.
This is a sophisticated and specifically political subject for a rock song, and the Stones' decision to address it directly placed "Highwire" in a tradition of protest music that names structural rather than personal wrongdoing. The song does not focus on individual villains or specific atrocities; instead, it identifies a systemic problem in how powerful nations conduct arms policy, treating short-term commercial and strategic interests as more important than the longer-term human consequences of flooding conflict zones with weaponry.
The highwire metaphor of the title conveys the precariousness of this geopolitical balancing act, the sense that nations engaged in arms dealing are walking a dangerous line that could at any moment tip into catastrophe. The image is particularly apt because a highwire walker's safety depends on constant adjustment and attention, yet the political actors being critiqued in the song appear to have acted with little regard for the instabilities they were creating. The contrast between the metaphor's implication of careful navigation and the reality of reckless policy is itself a form of irony built into the song's structure.
Mick Jagger's vocal performance on the track conveys a tone of controlled anger rather than hysteria, which is consistent with the song's lyrical approach. The critique is delivered with a degree of factual specificity that makes it feel more like an indictment than a lament, and the relative emotional restraint of the delivery actually increases the song's impact by treating its audience as capable of engaging with political argument rather than simply receiving emotional stimulation.
The song also touches on the human cost of the conflict at the level of the individual soldier and civilian, grounding the structural political critique in the consequences experienced by actual people. This movement between the macro-political and the micro-human is characteristic of effective political songwriting, which risks irrelevance if it remains entirely abstract and risks sentimentality if it remains entirely personal. "Highwire" navigates this balance with reasonable skill.
Within the context of the Rolling Stones' career in 1991, the song was a surprising and somewhat unexpected intervention. The band had spent much of the previous fifteen years producing music that was primarily concerned with personal themes, romantic and social observation, and the pleasures and demands of rock and roll itself. The decision to address the Gulf War so directly suggested that Jagger, in particular, retained a political consciousness that the commercial pressures of the band's later career had not entirely extinguished.
The song also carries implicit self-awareness about the Stones' own position as enormously wealthy individuals embedded in the global commercial culture they were partially critiquing. The band made no claim to moral purity in the song, which addressed political systems rather than positioning its authors as superior to those systems. This avoidance of self-righteous posturing was one of the song's more admirable qualities, and it kept the critique grounded in observable political reality rather than in the singer's personal virtue.
→ More from the 1990s File
View all 1990s hits →
Keep digging