The 1980s File Feature
Nothing In Common
Nothing in Common — Thompson Twins at the Summer's EdgeThree Becomes Two, Then Something DifferentBy the summer of 1986, Thompson Twins had completed one of …
01 The Story
Nothing in Common — Thompson Twins at the Summer's Edge
Three Becomes Two, Then Something Different
By the summer of 1986, Thompson Twins had completed one of the more remarkable shape-shifting acts in 1980s pop. The original group had been a sprawling seven-piece collective before Tom Bailey, Alannah Currie, and Joe Leeway stripped the operation down to a trio and then, with the recording of their next album cycle, effectively became a duo. Leeway departed during the making of Here's to Future Days, the 1985 album that launched Nothing in Common into the marketplace. The result was a band navigating significant internal transition while maintaining the polished synth-pop aesthetic that had brought them considerable success earlier in the decade with tracks like Hold Me Now and Doctor! Doctor!.
A Polished Sound in a Competitive Season
The summer of 1986 was not an easy time to break a new single. The chart landscape was crowded with strong performers; Peter Gabriel, Madonna, and a clutch of aggressive new acts were competing for radio real estate. Nothing in Common arrived with the production clarity that Bailey and Currie had mastered: layered synthesizers, a crisp rhythm track, and melodic sensibility tuned precisely to the sensibilities of pop radio. The song carried the emotional complexity the duo had been building toward: a relationship analysis set to an arrangement that sparkled on the surface while something more ambivalent moved underneath.
Ten Weeks of Steady Climbing
Nothing in Common debuted on the Billboard Hot 100 on July 26, 1986, entering at number 95. It climbed with the methodical patience the duo's better singles typically displayed: 82, 72, 68, 64 through August, continuing upward through the early weeks of September. Its peak of number 54 arrived on September 13, 1986, just as the summer was giving way to autumn. The song spent ten weeks on the chart, a solid if not spectacular run that placed it in the lower half of the Top 100 without quite breaking into the territory the band's biggest American hits had reached.
The Contraction of an Audience
The modestly lower chart ceiling on Nothing in Common compared to earlier Thompson Twins successes reflected broader shifts in the band's commercial position. The years between 1983 and 1985 had been their peak in terms of American radio penetration, a period when synthesizer-led British pop was landing on US charts with particular consistency. Acts like Duran Duran, Culture Club, and Eurythmics had widened the aperture for British electronic pop, and the Thompson Twins had ridden that opening with skill and timing. By 1986 that wave had not entirely receded, but domestic competition had intensified and the sonic palette that had felt fresh two years earlier was becoming familiar. The Thompson Twins adapted continuously, but maintaining chart momentum across multiple album cycles is a challenge that defeats most acts of any era, regardless of talent. The commercial window for any particular sound is finite.
Legacy and the Persistent Catalog
Thompson Twins continued releasing music through the early 1990s, eventually transitioning to a different project configuration entirely. Bailey and Currie would ultimately move on under different names and in different creative contexts, but the body of work they produced between 1983 and 1987 has held up remarkably well as a document of 1980s pop at its most sophisticated. The songwriting across that period demonstrated genuine range: from the anthemic warmth of Hold Me Now to the introspective analysis of Nothing in Common, they covered territory most single-register pop acts never attempted. The ambition was part of why their commercial trajectory eventually diverged from the format's expectations; they were trying to do more than the format rewarded. Nothing in Common represents a transitional moment in that catalogue: the craft fully intact, the emotional intelligence evident, the commercial timing slightly off. For listeners who care about the band's complete arc, it rewards the attention. Press play and hear two very skilled people making the best of a moment when the industry was already looking past them toward whatever came next.
“Nothing in Common” — Thompson Twins' singular moment on the 1980s charts.
02 Song Meaning
The Arithmetic of Incompatibility — What Nothing in Common Explores
A Relationship Diagnosed, Not Mourned
The title of Nothing in Common functions as both conclusion and starting point. The lyrical stance is less that of grief than of honest assessment: a relationship has been examined and the inventory has come back empty. Two people who were drawn together, who perhaps built something real for a time, have arrived at the recognition that their foundations were never shared. What distinguishes the song from a straightforward breakup anthem is the quality of attention it brings to that assessment. This is not anger. The tone is something closer to clear-eyed sorrow, the kind that comes after the drama has subsided and what remains is simply the truth of the situation.
Surface and Substance in Eighties Pop
Thompson Twins were always more interested in emotional precision than in melodrama, and Nothing in Common demonstrates that preference clearly. The mid-1980s pop landscape was heavily populated with songs that weaponized relationship pain for maximum dramatic effect; Thompson Twins, in contrast, consistently sought to describe rather than perform. The production choices on this track supported that approach: the arrangements were bright and clean but never frothy, leaving space for the lyrical content to do its work without being overwhelmed by the sonic environment. The surface was polished; the intelligence was genuine.
Compatibility as a Constructed Idea
One of the song's more interesting assumptions is that compatibility is something that can be measured and found wanting, not simply experienced as a feeling. The analytical framing of the title implies that a kind of ledger has been consulted and the columns do not balance. This is a notably rational approach to a subject that most love songs treat as purely emotional, and it tells you something about the songwriting sensibility at work. Tom Bailey and Alannah Currie were a romantic as well as professional partnership throughout the Thompson Twins years, which gives the material on compatibility and incompatibility an additional layer of resonance: this was not abstract theorizing.
What 1986 Audiences Heard
Listeners picking up Nothing in Common in the summer of 1986 were receiving it in a cultural moment when conversations about relationships were shifting. The previous decade's experimentation with alternative domestic arrangements had produced a significant body of experience, some of it instructive about what made partnerships work and what guaranteed their failure. The song's willingness to use the language of incompatibility, to say plainly that some pairings simply lack the shared ground to sustain themselves, spoke to an audience that had accumulated enough experience to recognize the analysis. It reached its peak of number 54 on September 13, 1986, spending ten weeks on the Hot 100.
The Elegance of Restraint
What makes the song worth returning to is precisely what might have limited its commercial ceiling: it refuses to reach for easy catharsis. There is no explosion, no accusation, no triumphant resolution. The song ends where it begins, with the clear and somewhat lonely recognition that two people do not share enough to continue together. That restraint is a form of respect, both for the subject matter and for the listener's intelligence. The 20 million YouTube views the song has accumulated suggest that the audience for emotional precision, for pop music that trusts its listeners to sit with ambivalence, has always been larger than the charts implied.
→ More from the 1980s File
View all 1980s hits →
Keep digging