Skip to main content
WikiHits · The Dossier 1980s Files Nº 12

The 1980s File Feature

What's Going On

Cyndi Lauper's "What's Going On": A Chart Run Built on Conscience and Coalition In the spring of 1987, Cyndi Lauper released a cover of Marvin Gaye's landmar…

Hot 100 Peaked at Nº 12 5.3M plays
Watch « What's Going On » — Cyndi Lauper, 1987

01 The Story

Cyndi Lauper's "What's Going On": A Chart Run Built on Conscience and Coalition

In the spring of 1987, Cyndi Lauper released a cover of Marvin Gaye's landmark 1971 social commentary anthem as her contribution to the Artists Against Apartheid charity campaign, and the recording arrived at a moment when pop radio was rediscovering its capacity for political purpose. The single debuted on the Billboard Hot 100 on March 14, 1987, entering at position 63, and over the following weeks it climbed steadily, reaching its peak of number 12 during the week of May 9, 1987. The song spent 13 weeks on the chart in total, making it a solid mid-chart performer rather than a blockbuster, but its cultural resonance extended well beyond its Hot 100 ranking.

The recording was not a solo project in the conventional sense. Lauper participated in a broader all-star initiative that produced a collective version of the Gaye classic, with proceeds directed toward fighting the apartheid regime in South Africa. The campaign drew in numerous prominent artists of the era, and Lauper's individual single was released alongside that collective effort. Her version was produced with a glossy late-1980s pop sheen that brought the song into alignment with the synthesizer-driven radio sound of the period, while still honoring the melodic and emotional core of the original Motown recording.

Marvin Gaye had written "What's Going On" in 1970 and released it in 1971, originally over the objections of Berry Gordy at Motown Records, who doubted the commercial viability of protest music. The track had become one of Motown's best-selling singles and one of the defining artistic statements of its era. For Lauper to select this song in 1987 was a deliberate act of lineage-claiming: she was placing herself within a tradition of artists who used their platform to challenge injustice, and she was updating that tradition for a new generation of listeners who had grown up with MTV and New Wave rather than Motown and soul radio.

Lauper's career in 1987 was at an interesting crossroads. Her debut album She's So Unusual (1983, Portrait/Epic Records) had produced four top-five singles and made her one of the defining pop figures of the mid-1980s, winning her a Grammy for Best New Artist. Her follow-up, True Colors (1986), had produced the number-one title track but had received a more mixed commercial reception overall. Releasing a politically charged cover in 1987 signaled both her continued artistic ambition and her desire to use her visibility for causes beyond the pop charts.

The chart trajectory from position 63 at debut to number 12 at peak represents a climb of more than fifty positions, driven by airplay momentum and the supportive media environment surrounding the anti-apartheid movement. Radio programmers in 1987 were broadly sympathetic to the cause, and the single's association with activism gave DJs and music directors an easy narrative hook for on-air promotion. The recording received heavy rotation on pop and adult contemporary stations, and its polished production values made it a natural fit for the mainstream formats that would carry it up the chart.

The music video, directed in the bright and saturated style typical of the period, reinforced the humanitarian messaging of the song and received significant airplay on MTV and VH1. Visual media had become central to the commercial life of a pop single by 1987, and Lauper had always understood the expressive power of the music video format, having established her visual persona decisively in the "Girls Just Want to Have Fun" clip from 1983.

The single was released on Epic Records in the United States and performed comparably in several international markets where anti-apartheid sentiment was strong among popular music audiences. In the United Kingdom, the song found radio support as well, as British pop culture had been heavily engaged with the South African political situation throughout the 1980s through initiatives like the Artists Against Apartheid coalition co-founded by Jerry Dammers of The Specials.

The song's 13-week chart run through the spring of 1987 positioned it as one of the more commercially successful charity singles of the era on the American pop chart, and it demonstrated that cause-driven music could achieve genuine mainstream traction when the artist involved had sufficient star power to carry the message into broad radio rotation. Lauper's reading of the song brought her political commitments into the open in a way that added dimension to a public image that had sometimes been reduced to its more colorful and playful surface elements.

02 Song Meaning

Asking the Question That Cannot Be Ignored: The Meaning of Cyndi Lauper's "What's Going On"

Marvin Gaye's original "What's Going On" posed its central question as both a plea and an indictment, and when Cyndi Lauper took up that question in 1987, the context transformed its meaning while leaving its emotional core intact. The song's great rhetorical power lies in its refusal to be satisfied with silence or with the comfortable evasions that institutions and individuals use to avoid confronting suffering. The question it asks is unanswerable in any simple way, and that impossibility of easy resolution is precisely the point.

In Gaye's original conception, the song was addressed to a society that had allowed Vietnam, urban poverty, and racial violence to continue unchecked, and the speaker positioned himself as a witness returning from the margins of that society to confront its contradictions. The speaker is bewildered not by the existence of injustice (which is taken as given) but by the collective willingness to look away. That bewilderment is both earnest and accusatory.

When Lauper performed the song in the context of the anti-apartheid movement of 1987, the "what" of the central question became specifically the system of racial segregation and state violence operating in South Africa. The song's emotional logic transferred intact: a system of institutionalized cruelty was being maintained by powerful actors while ordinary people around the world possessed both knowledge of that cruelty and the moral capacity to object to it. The question asked by the song became: given that we know, why do we not act more forcefully?

Lauper's vocal performance brought its own emotional register to the material. Where Gaye's original was suffused with a particular ache rooted in the African American experience of displacement and witness, Lauper's reading filtered the song through her own artistic identity: passionate, direct, unwilling to perform suffering aesthetically. Her voice does not beautify the pain the song describes; it channels it into forward motion, a quality that aligned well with the activist purpose of the recording.

The broader thematic tradition the song inhabits is one of bearing witness as an act of solidarity. To sing "what's going on" is not to claim ignorance but to refuse complicity in the performance of ignorance that oppressive systems require from bystanders in order to function. The song asks its listeners to acknowledge that they are not, in fact, ignorant: they know what is happening, and their continued normalcy is a choice. That moral pressure is the song's most enduring contribution to popular music's engagement with justice.

The lyrical images of war, environmental destruction, and human cruelty in Gaye's text operate as a catalogue of the many forms that the refusal to see can take. Each image adds weight to the central question, making the case that the pattern is not an accident or an exception but a systemic feature of how power organizes itself against the vulnerable. Lauper's interpretation honored that catalogue without reducing it to sentiment, maintaining the song's quality of argument within its quality of feeling.

The song functions as a form of moral summons, and its repetition of the central question across decades and by multiple artists is itself a testament to how persistently societies require that summons to be renewed.

Keep digging

Every hit has a story.